Thursday, September 29, 2005

Big News Day in US Government

Wow a shake up in the Republican Party as Tom Delay is indicted and forced to resign as Majority Leader. Stayed tuned for the fallout from this.

We have a new Chief Justice! The Senate confirms John Roberts as the 17th Chief Justice of the US Supreme Court. The final vote inthe Senate was 78-22.

On a lighter note.....I was impresssed by the debate today. There was content, there was passion, there was humor, there was anger. Way to go APL/G.

Don't forget Federalist 51 for tomorrow.
DT

Monday, September 26, 2005

Tuesday Fun

Thompson is posting as me. Darn Polyjuice potion! Tommorrow we'll each be disguised as the other.

Tuesday for English includes:
Political Language Vocab test (yes, it was on your calendar)
Affirmative Action questions handed in
Federalist Paper #10 due
Debate format/rubric for Constitutional Convention (Go Connecticut!)
Beowulf continued. . . what happens next? One of Beo's men was just devoured!!

Federalist Papers

For those of you who would love to read the other 83 essays that comprise the Federalist Papers you may at the following *******. Enjoy!!!
http://www.foundingfathers.info/federalistpapers/

Tuesday, September 20, 2005

Dunlap Broadsides

Today there are only 25 of these broadsides that are known to exist. The original Declaration of Independence that was signed by John Hancock and Charles Thomson after the delegates voted on July 4, 1776 is lost. One of these unsigned "Dunlap Broadsides", as it is known, sold for $8.14 million in a August 2000 New York City Auction. This copy was discovered in 1989 by a man browsing in a flea market who purchased a painting for four dollars because he was interested in the frame. Concealed in the backing of the frame was an Original Dunlap Broadside of the Declaration of Independence.
The other printings of the Dunlap Broadside known to exist are dispersed among private owners, American and British institutions. The following are the current know locations of the Dunlap Broadsides.
National Archives, Washington, DCLibrary of Congress, Washington, DC (two copies)Maryland Historical Society, BaltimoreUniversity of Virginia, Charlottesville, VAIndependence National Historic Park, PhiladelphiaAmerican Philosophical Society, PhiladelphiaHistorical Society of Pennsylvania, PhiladelphiaPrinceton University, Princeton, NJNew York Historical SocietyNew York Public LibraryPierpont Morgan Library, New YorkMassachusetts Historical Society, BostonHarvard University, Cambridge, MAChapin Library, Williams College, Williamstown, MAYale University, New Haven, CTAmerican Independence Museum, Exeter, NHMaine Historical Society, PortlandIndiana University, Bloomington, INChicago Historical SocietyCity of Dallas, City HallNorman Lear and David Hayden (private collectors)Public Record Office, United Kingdom (two copies)

Saturday, September 17, 2005

Open Thread

While we start up Unit Two, use this area for general comments, connections, and new ideas. . .

Monday, September 12, 2005

Machiavelli, anyone?

Karl Rove: America's Mullah, an article last year in the LA Times, reposted by Truthout. Okay, an enflamed liberal lashing out, but an interesting list of examples to support his comparison between Rove and Machiavelli. Note the thesis, support, clarification, and predicted implications. This form is where we are heading as a class; learn historical paradigm, offer current examples, offer predictions. Wouldn't it be interesting to write a essay response using this format with a recognizable person of your choice?

Machiavelli: Prince of Politicians? Very nice overview from about.com

This site has a letter from Nick Machiavelli to Karl Rove, suggesting campaign strategy for W. to defeat Kerry.

This site (Democratic Underground) has an historical perspective of The Prince, along with application (applied liberally) to W.

A private blog, on another site, which identifies and encourages W.'s Machiavellian tendencies. Mild obscene language warning, senior AP students.

Machiavelli, Bush, and Blair. -- from the "Waging Peace Foundation"

George Will wrote this article, which has a Hobbes reference in the ninth paragraph and nothing about Machiavelli. Do you get the analogy?

Enjoy! Comment freely.

Anonymous commenting

You no longer need to register to comment on this blog; my apologies I didn't catch it sooner.

Alumni Post/suggestions: Russell Moore

Dear Mr. Decker and Mr. Thompson, (I don't know Mr. Thompson's email)

Hello and how is APL/G (Why isn't it APS/G anymore? APL/G doesn't roll off the tongue very well..)? Since I already emailed another teacher I decided that I might as well email my old aps/g teachers. I'm doing well. This semester I'm taking up philosophy research and next semester I'm doing physics research. I tested out of basic philosophy, so now I'm taking elementary logic, which is just really simple deductive reasoning. I'm also in honors calculus, but since I took tutoring in calculus over the summer to develop a deeper understanding for electromagnetic radiation, all I end up doing with my schedule is sleeping, playing lacrosse, researching, and partying avidly. I have already received some phone calls that have asked for my help, so I decided to suggest some advice to your students to help them succeed in APL/G.

1. Normal people don't write philosophical papers/works. If they did everyone would have no problem discussing the meaning of life. Before reading anything philosophical it's hard to ask oneself why anyone normal would study it, so I developed an acronym: WWRS being Why Would Russ Study it? Philosophers do actually have something meaningful to say whether it is to advance our knowledge in logic, apply an atheist existential approach to a known concept, or to argue for Afrocentric feminist epistemological thought. So if you ask yourself WWRS and come up with a fairly decent answer, you will increase your comprehension just because you will know what the philosopher is trying to get at.

2. Make APL/G more fun. A 2 hour class pretty much sucks if you don't make it entertaining. You can make it more fun by dressing up like Socrates, boycotting discussions, or even just getting into the task at hand. By doing so APL/G won't become a sleep fest and you will actually learn something while having fun.

3. No matter what Mr. Decker and Mr. Thompson say Section 7 of the Republic (namely the Allegory of the Cave) is not about paradigms. It is about Plato's theory of forms (the inspatial nature of any specific thing) and how we can never fully know or understand the truth because people are ignorant. Of course the concept of paradigms can be derived from this. If Mr. Thompson or Mr. Decker fail to comply boycott them. It worked for the colonists.

4. Work hard in Government. You will keep building on your understanding of it and if you don't get it initially and slack off you will end up like me and study for an entire day before the final.
Well hope you two are doing fine and I hope I could be of help to your class.
Take care,
Russ

"By all means, marry. If you get a good wife, you'll become happy; if you get a bad one, you'll become a philosopher." --Socrates

Comments welcome.
"I was really too honest a man to be a politician and live." --Socrates

Thursday, September 08, 2005

First Symposium/Miscellaneous

In class I mentioned the purple-finger woman who sat with Laura Bush at the State of the Union and her current opinion on the draft Iraq Constitution. The article is from The Nation, which has high journalistic standards and a liberal bias. I encourage you to read it yourself.

The last three paragraphs of Plato's reading discussed the ideal nature of a ruler; essentially, one who prefers not to rule and looks "for rewards of a different kind." Flashback to the 2000 Presidential election, when Gore was overtly ambitious for rule and W. was rather nonchalant. At one debate, they were both asked what they would do if they lost. W. indicated he'd return to the life he was quite content with before the election and would rejoin the business world. Gore was unable to respond; his entire life had focused on this desire. . . . food for thought. I couldn't find the source, as the web is too clogged with other Election 2000 commentaries. Extra credit to the person who find the original transcript which corrects, clarifies, or condemns my recollection.

Study for Chapter 22 Vocab test on Friday.

Great symposium today. Please feel free to add futher comments here. Enjoy.

php hit counter