Tuesday, September 08, 2015

Welcome

As Congress heads back to work today just as you too head back to school, your first assignment is to chose one of the following headlines from the Washington Post and write a short 2-3 sentence comment. Your calendar mentions when this is due. Welcome to APL/G and Mr. Decker and I look forward to a great semester together.

Mr. Thompson


THE BIG IDEA:
Congress, returning from summer break today, has a lot to get done in the next three weeks. At the top of its long to-do list: averting a government shutdown and casting the most significant foreign policy vote since the 2002 Iraq war authorization. The legislative agenda is playing out against the backdrop of fresh doubts about the House speaker’s staying power. One conservative member says that a “sword of Damocles” hangs over John Boehner.
        1. Expect intense floor debate on Iran, starting this afternoon in the Senate. Sept. 17 is the deadline for action on an Iran nuclear agreement resolution. Democrats have the votes to allow the nuclear agreement to take effect. The question right now is whether President Obama can win the support of 41 senators, which would allow a filibuster of the planned Republican resolution of disapproval. That would spare him the need to use his veto pen. Democrats have a hard whip count of 38 votes backing the Iran deal, meaning they only need three of these five: Connecticut’s Richard Blumenthal, Washington’s Maria Cantwell, Michigan’s Gary Peters, Oregon’s Ron Wyden and West Virginia’s Joe Manchin. Manchin complicated things a little when he said he won’t participate in an Iran filibuster, so his support would require another to come onboard; he’s poised to announce his decision later this morning.
        2. A continuing resolution must past by Sept. 30 to keep the government from shutting down. It seems very unlikely there will be any agreement this month to lift the budget limits imposed by sequestration, even though there’s significant bipartisan support to do so. The reason is Republicans want to increase defense spending; Democrats say they’ll only go along if domestic program caps are lifted too, which many conservatives say would unacceptably grow the deficit. And, of course, most streams of fresh revenue are off the table. So we’ll likely wind up with a short-term funding measure that once again kicks the can down the road. Republican sources say it’s unclear how long the extension will last, but it seems most likely that we’ll postpone a bigger spending showdown for later this year.
         Planned Parenthood complicates the funding debate and makes real the possibility of an Oct. 1 shutdown. Undercover videos emboldened Ted Cruz and other conservatives to pledge they’ll oppose any spending bill, even something short-term, that includes money for the group. Democrats, including the White House, are adamant that they won’t cave and stress that federal law already prevents Planned Parenthood from using taxpayer money for abortions.
        Republican leadership desperately wants to avoid a shutdown. They’re mindful of the lessons from the 2013 fight to defund Obamacare and this past winter’s failed gambit to defund the Homeland Security Department. Back home in Kentucky last week, Mitch McConnell reiterated that Republicans “just don’t have the votes” to defund Planned Parenthood.
        That said, the base is angry enough that McConnell and Boehner may still need to engage in some degree of brinkmanship. From the right, the Senate Majority Leader faces 2016 GOP candidates — from Cruz to Marco Rubio, Rand Paul and Lindsey Graham —  eager to impress social conservatives in the early states. From the center, McConnell must grapple with how to protect incumbent senators up for reelection next year in blue states who would seemingly want to avoid this battle as much as possible, such as Illinois’ Mark Kirk, Ohio’s Rob Portman or New Hampshire’s Kelly Ayotte.
        3. Keep in mind there will be several days this month on which no legislating gets done: Rosh Hashanah is Sept. 14-15. Yom Kippur is Sept. 23. Pope Francis speaks to a joint session of Congress on Sept. 24, a day that will be full of fanfare and seems likely to become politicized.
        4. Boehner’s future as speaker in doubt. That’s the banner headline on Politico this morning. “Figures in his close-knit circle of allies are starting to privately wonder whether he can survive an all-but-certain floor vote this fall to remain speaker of the House,” Jake Sherman and John Bresnahan report. “And, for the first time, many top aides and lawmakers in the House do not believe he will run for another term as House leader in 2017.” The reporters interviewed more than a dozen lawmakers and aides in direct contact with Boehner: “Uniformly they sympathized with his plight … But they also questioned Boehner’s viability in the near- and long-term.”
        The success of Donald Trump will embolden the right to challenge leadership more aggressively. “Mark Meadows looks like a much bigger deal than he did in July,” Post reporter Mike DeBonis reports this morning, looking at the unexpected challenge by the North Carolina congressman to Boehner just before recess. It does not currently have the votes to succeed, but the threat of a vote to oust Boehner – in which Democrats could meddle – will hang like a storm cloud over the remaining months of 2015.
        Many, including Rep. Mick Mulvaney (R-S.C.), now refer to the Meadows motion as a “sword of Damocles” hanging over Boehner. “If they haven’t gotten the message that they need to change the direction of our leadership, it could be a very ugly fall for our party,” said Mulvaney. “The people who are for Donald Trump are against John Boehner, and John needs to accept that and figure out what to do about it.”

50 Comments:

At 1:04 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

"A continuing resolution must past by Sept. 30 to keep the government from shutting down."
This article portrays both the democratic and republican politicians as being unwilling to compromise. Seeing as the presidential election is coming up and both parties are pushing issues that appeal very heavily to certain populations, the politicians are seemingly trying to force people to pick between the two parties in order to gain more support for their candidates.
Kristen Hansen

 
At 3:35 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Expect intense floor debate on Iran, starting this afternoon in the Senate. Sept. 17 is the deadline for action on an Iran nuclear agreement resolution."
I don't believe any countries should have access to any kind of nuclear weapons. Even though this resolution is heavily Democrat-supported, Republicans should consider the morality of the situation and how this resolution would effect relations between the countries. No one wants to get nuked and by giving up the production of them there would in turn be less intense arguing (which is all fear-based) on the Senate floor.
Dylan Hilliker

 
At 7:03 PM, Blogger Unknown said...

"Boehner’s future as speaker in doubt"

This goes to show that the Republican party can't even agree with themselves, much less with Democrats. The "Sword of Damocles" analogy, I feel, is an exaggeration because Boehner's time as the Speaker would be over eventually and he has faced the same rumor in the past with it not coming true. "Boehner is nearly certain to lose the support of the 25 lawmakers who voted against him last time, plus a few more who've grown frustrated with him." This statement is a paradox because how could he loose the support of those who are already against him? Even if he isn't the Speaker of the House, Tiberi admits that a new speaker may not change the fact that they don't have the votes to defund Planned Parenthood, one of Boehner's goals.

 
At 8:11 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Planned Parenthood complicates the funding debate and makes real the possibility of an Oct. 1 shutdown. Undercover videos emboldened Ted Cruz and other conservatives to pledge they’ll oppose any spending bill, even something short-term, that includes money for the group. Democrats, including the White House, are adamant that they won’t cave and stress that federal law already prevents Planned Parenthood from using taxpayer money for abortions."

This raises questions of morality in our political leaders today to even consider continuing to fund Planned Parenthood. According to Snopes, "...commercial fetal tissue transactions take place in something of a legal gray zone: agencies may sell fetal tissue that has been “donated” for that purpose (through abortion), but they may not profit from it. According to federal law they may only charge for the processing and shipping involved in transferring the material from donor to purchaser, but the law doesn’t regulate how much they may charge", a lack that allows cells to be sold for thousands of dollars, such as liver stem cells sold for $24,000, apparently just for shipping and handling. How can our political leaders look at an already abominable act, the killing - or murder - of an unborn child, and debate whether or not the continuation of said killing and harvesting - for profit - deserves funding? Legal, perhaps, but moral?

Aaron Kapinos

 
At 8:22 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Intense floor debate on Iran"
While the Iran deal is reasonable as it provides specified limits and hopefully downsizing of nuclear armaments in Iran it still leaves Iran with the ability to develop and create nuclear weapons which, given the nation's history may be a cause for concern. However, even if the U.S government refuses the deal in the end we need to keep in mind that the rest of the UN security council (China,Russian Federation, France, The UK, Angola, Chad, Chile, Jordan, Lithuania, Malaysia, New Zealand, Nigeria, Spain,and Venezuela) could easily overturn our refusal and approve of the deal regardless. Should we agree however, we must be wary of this deal/treaty as Machiavelli himself warned in Chapter XVIII and quote "Of this endless modern examples have been made void and of no effect through the faithlessness of princes;" (Machiavelli Ch.18 Lines 18-20). This is key as he warns that time and again leaders of powerful nations have broken treaties when it best suits them.

Mitchell Trantow

 
At 8:57 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Impending Government Shutdown... Again
Most of the time, the goings on of our government go over my head or in one ear and out the other. However, it seems to me that in those rare times I poke my head out from beneath the rock under which I reside, there is always a pressing issue on which some sort of compromise must be reached. Like a bad superhero movie though, tension just builds until at the last moment, some small agreement is reached that barely placates the involved parties and merely "kicks [the true issue] down the road" to be dealt with later. Come on people, stop procrastinating; there must be a more efficient way to get things decided and done than painstakingly and stubbornly refusing all offers presented until the end!

Christina Wentz

 
At 10:37 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Just realized I quoted Machiavelli wrong by leaving out a key phrase that supported my point so please disregard my earlier quote and here's the correct quote, "Of this endless modern examples could be given, showing how many treaties and engagements have been made void and of no effect through the faithlessness of princes;" (Machiavelli Ch.18 Lines 18-20) That's how Machiavelli actually warned of the weakness in treaties between princes (leaders)

Mitchell Trantow

 
At 11:04 PM, Anonymous Haron Arama said...

Keep in mind there will be several days this month on which no legislating gets done: Members of congress already don't convene enough and even if they did I don't think they'd achieve much anyway. The two-party system the United States seems to have adopted is going to limit the progression this country can truly make. The founders of this nation never wanted parties in the first place but now we can only live with them. The United States will still be left behind if the way we govern ourselves doesn't change and with the impetus of technology the majority of us can access the internet. Around 268.16 Million Americans have access to the internet which is almost 83.8% of the population according to recent census statistics from 2013. The internet can provide us the ability to be our own representatives in congress no more electing senators and representatives to vote they can craft the laws but we as a population should vote on them by means of the internet and I believe this version of democracy allows us to have the deepest most encompassing democracy possible and could even possibly create the democratic utopia the ancient greeks imagined as they created this form of government. After all it is "we the people" that rule and we should utilize technology as a form of voting for laws we want in turn this form of voting will be easier faster and increase voter turn out as well as better fully represent and put the power of governing in the hands of regular Americans.

 
At 1:44 AM, Anonymous Kevin Andrews said...

Expect intense floor debate on Iran: Filibusters are the single most idiotic thing our legislatures can do; they're a waste of time, and with such short deadlines to try and get things done, there's no need to waste that kind of time. And although everyone loves a good Dr. Seuss book, should it really okay to read while in session, simply to kill time, when there's important matters to discuss?

 
At 2:00 AM, Anonymous Ellen Chen said...

"Expect intense floor debate on Iran, starting this afternoon in the Senate. Sept. 17 is the deadline for action on an Iran nuclear agreement resolution."

I believe that it would be in the best interest of our country's internation relations to accept this deal. The nuclear deal will both greatly reduce the amount of uranium in Iran's possesion as well as the percentage they are able to enrich the uranium, and allow constant international survelliance of Iran's nuclear facilities. This will virtually remove Iran's ablity to create a nuclear bomb while allowing them to use nuclear technology for peaceful purposes such as energy. While many of our morals and beliefs may not align with Iran's government, I believe it is best to open up further negotiations with Iran and reduce the threat of nuclear warfare.

 
At 4:02 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Expect intense floor debate on Iran, starting this afternoon in the Senate. Sept. 17 is the deadline for action on an Iran nuclear agreement resolution."

After I read this headline, I started looking up recent news about the Iran deal and I read many articles about Republicans failing to prevent the passing of the deal (which many are calling a "win for President Obama and democrats"). I personally am not quite sure where exactly I stand surrounding this deal. I watch the news every morning and the past months it has always been a major headline, but I have noticed it less and less each week. Obviously it is one of those debates they seem to go on forever with out a resolution. However now there is an apparent resolution but then one of the articles I was reading said that the deal is not legally binding on the US or the next president. So if the next president is Republican (which seems to be likely), they can tear up the agreement when they come into office. This probably wouldn't be done damage free but the outline of the deal right now appears not to be perfect either, especially the fact that a larger percentage of Americans disapprove the deal rather than support it.

Emma Christensen

 
At 4:47 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Expect intense floor debate on Iran, starting this afternoon in the Senate. Sept. 17 is the deadline for action on an Iran nuclear agreement resolution"
I find it unlikely that Obama will be able to make the republicans cooperate, as many politicians have a paradigm of only agreeing with those from your party, whether you agree with the subject or not. I think the democrats are definitely coming out on top for this one, but a filibuster would be interesting to watch in the news.
Nathaniel Eberhard

 
At 5:24 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Expect intense floor debate on Iran, starting this afternoon in the Senate. Sept. 17 is the deadline for action on an Iran nuclear agreement resolution:

As the Iowa Republican,Steve King, stated, "It paves the way not just for a nuclear Iran, but a very highly powered nuclear Iran that changes the dynamics in the region and changes the destiny of the world". I partially agree with what he has stated above because not only would it give Iran the opportunity to make deadly nuclear weapons but they will also hold the fate of the world in their hands. But, on the Democratic view, like Democrat Durbin, if Congress doesn't agree with the Iran deal, not only is their fear of an invasion but Iran might even climb but to the hierarchy of power and become a bigger threat to the United States. These two views, the Republic and Democratic, will both go head to head on the debate; they will have to give their all in order to make the best decision for the United States and for the President to not have to use the power of his veto that might cause even more turmoil for America and heighten the concern of it being bigger than we feared: the decision between war and peace.
Samira Hassan

 
At 6:07 PM, Anonymous Jason Howard said...

"Expect intense floor debate on Iran, starting this afternoon in the Senate. Sept. 17 is the deadline for action on an Iran nuclear agreement resolution"

If believe that the agreement should be passed, it would create a safe situation for Iran to possess nuclear power. The way that world is progressing it is only a matter of time until a large majority of countries possess nuclear capabilities. Allowing Iran this capability in this way they will be monitored and limited so they can use nuclear power to benefit their country in a safe way.

 
At 9:38 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Boehner’s future as speaker in doubt:

Although I know very little about the government and usually pay seldom attention to current events and news stories regarding our legislative branch, I am caught up on the fact that Donald Trump is running for president. However, when I read this article it made me cringe at the fact that John Boehner could lose his job due to Trump's rising power because, if it's one thing I do know, it's that Trump does not deserve any voice in our government let alone the presidency. I did begin to look up articles and news stories to read more about why John Boehner might lose his job as speaker of the house, and one reason ties into our government's budgeting with Planned Parenthood and the Iran nuclear affair. It is said the republican party is frustrated with both the Iran nuclear deal and Planned Parenthood defunding, and may choose to take it out on Boehner.

Hannah Lucey

 
At 9:03 AM, Anonymous Ryan Neumann said...

" Expect intense floor debate on Iran, starting this afternoon in the Senate. Sept. 17 is the deadline for action on an Iran nuclear agreement resolution."

Although nuclear weapons are extremely dangerous and the world would be better off without them, Iran has the right to be nuclear as well as we do, it requires more regulation and a close-kept watchful eye on them as it does with any country with a nuclear arsenal at their disposal but if the entire world is going to own nuclear weapons then Iran should be given that right as well, so long as they agree to the UN's conditions to owning them and they allow the world to moderate their creation and use of weapons. Although I believe nuclear weapons should be alltogether disposed of, Iran does have the right, the same as we do, and on top of that our country and the rest can benefit from excepting this deal because it limits the amount of nuclear "yellowcake" (used in the creation of uranium) and uranium is mined and processed due to the fact that they have to keep the same nuclear conditions the U.S. does and the rest of the countries in the UN do.

 
At 12:48 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Expect intense floor debate on Iran, starting this afternoon in the Senate. Sept. 17 is the deadline for action on an Iran nuclear agreement resolution."

Seeing as the agreement calls for Iran to give up around 97% of its enriched Uranium, and to keep their remaining 300kg stockpile at up to 3.67% enrichment for the next decade, I think that this deal is both reasonable and safe because it allows Iran to be closely supervised to make sure that they are not secretly developing new nuclear facilities. Furthermore, an enrichment of hardly 4% is categorized as reactor grade Uranium, not nearly enough to sustain the production of nuclear weapons which requires at least 90%. With regards to the 3 remaining votes required to allow the filibuster, although Senator Manchin announced his opposition towards the deal, Senators Blumenthal, Peters, and Wyden have announced their support of the agreement. Although I, personally, don't support access to nuclear weapons for any countries, I do agree with Ellen on the idea that this deal would potentially keep any possibility of nuclear warfare at bay while simultaneously paving the way for future negotiations with Iran.

Mohammed Bashier

 
At 3:21 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

"A continuing resolution must past by Sept. 30 to keep the government from shutting down."

More and more articles on the topic of Congress and legislature begin to sound like showdowns or even an all out war between Republicans and Democrats. Language like "lessons from the 2013 fight", "past winter’s failed gambit", "McConnell must grapple with how to protect incumbent senators", and "seemingly want to avoid this battle" create a tense, even violent atmosphere around senate and house debates that only furthers America's increasingly bipartisan battleground of a government. One wonders if by losing ourselves in this two sided battle for america we have lost sight of the goal of congress that is to pass laws to better the lives of its citizens not to further the agenda or gain power over one party.
Nikhil Khurana

 
At 4:30 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

A continuing resolution must past by Sept. 30 to keep the government from shutting down.

The U.S. Government may soon shut down once again due to the recent Planned Parenthood budget controversy, and although I disagree with some of the actions of Planned Parenthood, I think it is ridiculous that 31 Republicans have signed a pledge to oppose any bill that does not completely defund the organization, especially considering that the President has made it clear that he does not intend to pass such a bill. I completely agree with 2016 Presidential Candidate John Kasich’s statement, “So you’d shut the government down and then over time you’d have to open it back again and you wouldn’t have achieved much. But when you shut the government down, people don’t like it. And you shouldn’t shut it down unless you have a great chance of success.” I understand the reasoning of the Republicans; however, I do not feel that defunding Planned Parenthood is critical enough to warrant the cessation of the government.
Steffi Tetzloff

 
At 4:34 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

*By "such a bill", I mean a bill that eliminates all funding for Planned Parenthood.
Steffi Tetzloff

 
At 4:45 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Expect intense floor debate on Iran, starting this afternoon in the Senate. Sept. 17 is the deadline for action on an Iran nuclear agreement resolution"

While the Republican Party have a point in wanting to deny Iran nuclear technologies due to our tense current relationship and both countries hostility toward each other in the past, the Democratic Party is seeking to calm their fears through heavy monitoring of sites such as Natanz and little activities at sites such as Fordo. While the Republican Party claims that Iran will try to make nuclear weapons, the Democratic Party believes that this long term monitoring will keep the danger of nuclear weapons at zero. Additionally Democrats claim that by lifting sanctions from Iran and allowing them to develop nuclear technology for power will create a path for negotiations down the road.
Ryan Movall

 
At 6:05 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Expect intense floor debate on Iran, starting this afternoon in the Senate. Sept. 17 is the deadline for action on an Iran nuclear agreement resolution"


I have been watching the news for months about the Iran Deal. I fully support the agreement because this deal will prevent Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons. There seems to be no better option to prevent an Iranian nuclear weapon. Unless conservatives come up with a better solution, this should be passed.

Ashalul Aden

 
At 6:06 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

"A continuing resolution must past by Sept. 30 to keep the government from shutting down."

I myself find it absurd that Republicans want to increase defense spending, by far the most bloated portion of the government's discretionary spending. They also have the audacity to claim that domestic programs would "unacceptably grow the deficit," as if defense spending isn't already an obscenely large portion of the deficit. There should be a focus on domestic programs to solve problems at home before the military tries to become the world's police force and solve other nations' problems.
Tim Brown

 
At 6:52 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

"The legislative agenda is playing out against the backdrop of fresh doubts about the House speaker’s staying power. One conservative member says that a “sword of Damocles” hangs over John Boehner..."

The sword of Damocles is mentioned frequently when talking about politicians. It originates from a Greek parable in which Damocles, a member of the court compliments Dionysius (the guy in charge) on his abundance of power and is surprised when Dionysius then offers that power to him. He eagerly jumps at this chance, but then realizes there's a sharp sword hanging from the ceiling over his head by just a horse hair; he then begs Dionysius to go back to his poorer but safer life. Mark Meadows and anyone else looking to take over for Boehner should heed this myth well.

Jenna Milligan

 
At 6:59 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

"A continuing resolution must past by Sept. 30 to keep the government from shutting down."

Piggybacking off of what Tim said, I think some statistics would be useful in pointing out just how much we're spending on our military.
Of our discretionary spending of roughly $1,100,000,000,000 ($1.1 trillion), about $598,490,000,000 ($598 billion) went to Military spending, which is 53.71% of the entire budget. This compares to Education receiving $70,000,000,000, $39,100,000,000 on Energy and Environment related programs, and Science programs receiving $29,700,000,000. All of these figures came from nationalpriorities.org.
This figure is ridiculous when compared to other countries as well. The US comes in a distant first in military spending. In fact, we spend as much on our military than that of the next 9 countries combined. Military spending in the US is 3.6x greater than that of China, second place in military spending. This is a country with 4.25x as many people as America (census.gov/popclock). If you add up all of the military budgets for all the countries in the world, it comes out to about $1,700,000,000,000 ($1.7 trillion). Of that, the US makes up 37%. As we discussed in class, there is approximately 200 countries in the world, so if each country gave the same amount, each should make up 0.5%. Not 74x more than that. Many of these figures came from nationalpriorities.org.
I hope that these statistics helped put our military spending into perspective.
Jonah Amundsen

 
At 7:35 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

"A continuing resolution must past by Sept. 30 to keep the government from shutting down."
If the politicians would like to avoid another government shut down, I believe that a good option would be not to spend as much on non-top priority things such as more military spending. My thought process on this is that why would you spend more of your time and resources for something that you are the top off already? Going off what Jonah had said, if we are the country that spends the most on military spending why should we increase if no other country proves as competition. My idea of how to help prevent a government shutdown is to be more mindful of the numbers and what they mean as well as if they are good or bad statistical data.
Darren Anes DyQuiangco

 
At 8:03 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

"A continuing resolution must past by Sept. 30 to keep the government from shutting down..."

One of the main reasons behind the impending government shutdown is the debate between Republicans and Democrats over the possible defunding of Planned Parenthood. The debate centers around abortion, though Planned Parenthood does not use tax dollars to fund abortions, and only 3% of its overall services are abortions (which has been legal in the United States since 1973). Many people are misinformed on the organization and are unaware that its main purpose is to provide basic healthcare services and education.

Sara Burnap

 
At 8:20 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Keep in mind there will be several days this month on which no legislating gets done"

This is just perpetuating the idea that Congress is the opposite of progress. While the current political deadlock is an issue with effectively very little accomplished due to the differing parties in charge of legislative and executive powers, the fact that Congress gets varying vacations due to religious events that may not apply to every representative makes it seem as if their role as an elected official is a part time concern. The standard workweek in Congress is roughly 3 days long as is, and with their planned non-legislative days, They lose another 20% of their "work time"

Alex Ngov

 
At 8:39 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

"A continuing resolution must be passed by Sept. 30 to keep the government from shutting down...Republicans want to increase defense spending; Democrats say they’ll only go along if domestic program caps are lifted too...we’ll likely wind up with a short-term funding measure that once again kicks the can down the road."

Considering that Congress agreed to make spending cuts after the last government shutdown, it seems highly unethical to break their word and increase spending on both Defense and Domestic Programs. Rather than avoiding another shut down by simply raising the debt ceiling and placing an even heavier burden on future generations, the representatives should spend their time setting a reasonable budget and not drowning the country in debt. If the Republicans and Democrats really want fairness, they should agree not to raise spending in either of their chosen areas, and accomplish what they said they would do nearly a year ago: cut government spending.
Kellie Frost

 
At 8:51 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Expect intense floor debate on Iran, starting this afternoon in the Senate. Sept. 17 is the deadline for action on an Iran nuclear agreement resolution"

Another example of bipartisan politics, in which neither side can agree upon a decision. I myself don't quite understand why exactly the U.S. is lifting sanctions on Iran,and allowing them to continue with their nuclear program, especially with all the instability during this time in the Middle East. Not only that, but Iran has claimed multiple times that they will wipe Israel out, saying "Israel will not see the end of the next 25 years." I know that Iran is supposed to cut their stores of nuclear material, but I still don't see this as "a victory for diplomacy, for American national security, and for the safety and security of the world," which is the opinion of the president. I just don't think the deal is good enough, as it has far more benefits for Iran than for the U.S. and the rest of the world.

Jonathan Hickman

 
At 9:13 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Keep in mind there will be several days this month on which no legislating gets done."

I feel like this statement accurately describes our government and its efficiency. Between these holiday breaks and the already sparse work days as it is, not to mention the hard bipartisanship which already discourages attempts to find a middle ground on days they do convene, the government rarely gets any legislation done anyways. I'm not surprised in the least that there will continue to be days "on which no legislating gets done."

-Carter Holland

 
At 9:39 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

"A continuing resolution must past by Sept. 30 to keep the government from shutting down."

Although my knowledge on government spending is usually limited to the notifications that the CNN app sends me, I am aware that there is much debate going on regarding the funding of Planned Parenthood. Personally, I find it ridiculous that Ted Cruz and other conservatives are opposing the funding a health care facility for over 5 million people who typically can't afford traditional health care services. I appreciate the democrats who advocate for Planned Parenthood by stressing that taxpayer money does not go towards abortions as well as speaking out about the critical family planning that Planned Parenthood provides to its patients, including sex education, tests that help detect cancer, and treatment for sexually transmitted diseases that most likely would go untreated if the patients could not go to Planned Parenthood.

Hannah Walker

 
At 10:00 PM, Blogger Unknown said...

"Expect intense floor debate on Iran, starting this afternoon in the Senate. Sept. 17 is the deadline for action on an Iran nuclear agreement resolution"

I personally believe that no country should hold any form of nuclear weapons, for "With great power comes great responsibility." And when given a power that withholds a high magnitude of danger the human psyche would usually turn to the path that is considered "wrong" which then allows that person or persons the potential of causing harm to the mass population. Therefor no sovereign state should be give the right to control any sort of nuclear weapon.

Joshua Anes Dy Quiangco

 
At 10:02 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Keep in mind there will be several days this month on which no legislating gets done."

This article is particularly pointless when considering the fact that there are numerous days of EVERY month that no legislating gets done. Congress is in session less than five days a week, and on the days they do work they get paid loads of money to sit around and argue, rarely coming to a consensus on anything. Another reason I believe that congressmen should still have to work on the specific holidays mentioned in the article is that very few members are actually Jewish. Maybe their lack of days on the job is one of the reasons Congress has such a low approval rating. If someone in the private sector had a fourteen percent job approval rating, they would be fired immediately.

Taylor Janisch

 
At 10:10 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

"A continuing resolution must past by Sept. 30 to keep the government from shutting down."

I did some research into past government shutdowns, and discovered that there have been 12 situations (the first in 1976, the latest in 2013) in which a shutdown occurred (not including the times when the government didn't physically "shutdown" during the funding gaps). In most of these scenarios, a bi-partisan government that refused to budge on their legislation led to the shutdown, these legislators then compromising after the shutdown occurred. It really annoys me that they couldn't have found a way to compromise sooner, and that our leaders would rather put someone who elected them out of a job rather than agree on something prior to the government shutdowns.

Brett Herbers

 
At 10:12 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Keep in mind there will be several days this month on which no legislating gets done"

As people have pointed out, the fact that there are so many days that congress gets nothing done is quite astounding. I also agree with this, and I would also like to add that I got the opportunity to see the Senate "in session" and I saw that they could get almost nothing done. There were reasons, one being that the senators couldn't come to an agreement, the other main one being that there were only 4-5 senators actually there. I don't think congress should be given more days off considering they don't show up to meetings most of the time anyway.

Connor Davis

 
At 10:26 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Keep in mind their will be several days this month on which no legislating gets done"

This headline is a devastating problem today in America. Legislation in the United States today is very limited as far as their desire and strive for the United States to become an overall better country for its citizens. The main goal Congress should strive for is becoming more productive as we approach a new leader to govern our nation in future years. Also, the true reality is Congress is getting paid for accomplishing way less than their potential.

Brandon Ratzloff

 
At 10:33 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Expect intense floor debate on Iran, starting this afternoon in the Senate. Sept. 17 is the deadline for action on an Iran nuclear agreement resolution."

President Obama needs the support of 41 senators for a filibuster of the Iran deal, but there are only 38 senators with support. Senator Joe Manchin stated that he would not participate in an Iran filibuster, although if he does support the agreement, then another senator would also need to support it in order to participate in the filibuster. In my opinion a filibuster should not happen because it uses our government's time to stop a bill from passing and this month will already have many days of no legislation happening as a result of Rosh Hashanah and Yom Kippur. Since neither side can come to a decision, our political leaders will take a lengthened amount of time coming to an agreement about this issue. Since the deadline for a decision is September 17th, then an agreement will need to be made soon. Hilary Clinton supports the deal with some caution. Hilary Clinton states in an article from The New York Times that supporting this agreement would "...work only 'as part of a larger strategy toward Iran...'" but the power of Iran's capital would need to be contained if the sanctions were to be lifted.

Andi Stensland

 
At 10:42 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Keep in mind their will be several days this month on which no legislation gets done"
I believe that this fact is prevalent throughout the year as there are many days during which nothing gets accomplished through congress. And when attempting to avoid a government shut down you would think that congress would be working immensly hard everyday instead of having quite a few days where nothing is accomplished. It's understandable that compromise among different parties takes time but both parties should be working everyday to find that compromise and come to that agreement.
Abby Anderson

 
At 10:42 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

"A continuing resolution must past by Sept. 30 to keep the government from shutting down"

In my opinion, this shutdown stuff is getting kinda annoying. Dealing with the Republicans, I don't understand why they'd want to increase defense spending while we have a military that can hold itself on their own with what they get on spending right now. But then again, with the increase of defense spending, the U.S. is more prepared for home attacks and deploying troops to support countries that need our military such as Syria. Either way, if the Republicans gets this on their main priorities for spending, then awesome you have yourself a more well protected U.S. and have a chance to protect other countries. If not, then its nothing big to get furious that's not a priority to spend on

David Nguyen

 
At 11:00 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

In my opinion, the government needs to address the issue of the federal budget in a different manner. The Democrats and Republicans need to stop bickering and have an actual conversation of what can be done to keep the government fully operational while at the same time reducing the spending that keeps lowering America into an ever worsening avalanche of debt. Any politician who is unwilling to acknowledge, recognize, and compromise with another party for the greater good of America might as well just step down now because, if the past is any indication, the government will shut down again. Until politicians overcome their pride and arrogance I believe America will be stuck in a state of brokenness and continual dissension. As stated by John C. Maxwell "There are two kinds of pride, both good and bad. 'Good pride' represents our dignity and self-respect. 'Bad pride' is the deadly sin of superiority that reeks of conceit and arrogance." Yes, politicians need to have opinions, but this doesn't mean that they can't put this aside to work together for a better America.

Khiara Las

 
At 11:12 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Expect intense floor debate on Iran"

I don't quite understand the need for a filibuster in government. Don't get me wrong, I have a basic understanding of what a filibuster is intended for, but isn't the point of government to make decisions that impact the here and now of today's society? At this rate, any decision made regarding a nuclear agreement in Iran will be obsolete before it even takes effect, leading us back to where we started, repeating this process all over again.

Joe Devlin

 
At 11:14 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Keep in mind their will be several days this month on which no legislation gets done"
So, business as usual, right? There's a reason people refer to it as a "do-nothing congress": they do pretty dang close to nothing. The Politico article "'Worst Congress ever,' by the numbers" reported that the number of bills passed by the 113th congress (from 2013-14) as 234, the lowest total in congressional history. The article in the original post mentions days on which congress is scheduled to do nothing, but that's not really the big problem. The problem is even on the few days on which congress does meet (just 40% of all calendar days according to the same Politico article), they are to politically divided to do legislate effectively. Congressional approval ratings are at an all-time low, yet congress is doing little to win back the favor of the constituencies whom they represent. What congress needs to do is set aside their partisanship and focus on legislating according to the interests of the American people; if they can somehow accomplish this, then taking days off for Rosh Hashanah and papal visits will not be such a big deal.

-Collin Mulvey

 
At 11:31 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Keep in mind there will be several days this month which no legislating gets done."

I find the unproductiveness in Congress to be increasingly frustrating. While most congressmen and congresswoman are bipartisan, and therefore represent either their Republican or Democratic beliefs, as a person holding a position of public office, it is their job to do what it is right for the people. Not for them, or their party, but the people they are representing. However, this often seems to get clouded behind what each party thinks and instead of being productive, we go nowhere because they can't compromise with each other. I respect Congressional members getting time off for the holy days of their religions. However, one would hope that they would work even harder after they get back, unfortunately, that just won't be the case.
Meghan Jirik

 
At 12:05 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Expect intense floor debate on Iran, starting this afternoon in the Senate. Sept. 17 is the deadline for action on an Iran nuclear agreement resolution."

I really don't follow the news that much, stay up to date on trending topics or pay attention to what goes on in society. However this topic of the Iranian nuclear agreement resolution peaked my interest. From what I can gather the democratic party blocked a republican resolution to the deal without the president using his veto power. "This vote is a victory for diplomacy, for American national security, and for the safety and security of the world" -President Obama. I disagree with this whole scenario. In my opinion the world will never truly be safe. There will always be someone out there who wants to harm someone else, isn't satisfied with what they have/own, wanting conflict. In all honesty the only way to keep the world safe was to do as George Washington the founder of our country said, "No political parties, no foreign alliances, no debt", we had one simple job and we as a nation couldn't even follow that. For us to be great leaders we must first learn to follow.
-Thomas Trahan

 
At 12:31 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Expect intense floor debate on Iran, starting this afternoon in the Senate. Sept. 17 is the deadline for action on an Iran nuclear agreement resolution. Democrats have the votes to allow the nuclear agreement to take effect."

It's immensely frightening to think that not only I, but kids all across the U.S. and Iran are sleeping in our beds tonight on the same soil responsible for manufacturing nuclear weapons. The U.S. government will claim that it's our right and responsibility to have that kind of gun power, but then they will turn back around and say that it's not right that another country gets to do the same. The solution? Both countries get to have nuclear weapons! Hurray! How about nobody gets to have nuclear weapons, how about that? The Washington Post states "The agreement increases the “breakout” time — the amount of time it would take Iran to produce enough bomb-grade material for a singular nuclear weapon — to at least one year."

So I guess I can sleep peacefully for now, knowing that Iran doesn't have enough uranium or plutonium to construct a nuclear bomb. But as for America's safety in 2016 and so on, who knows when we will have our next world war. This time, it might just blow Pearl Harbor out of the water. Literally.

Katrina Carrow

 
At 12:50 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Expect intense floor debate on Iran, starting this afternoon in the Senate. Sept. 17 is the deadline for action on an Iran nuclear agreement resolution". The fact that this is even a discussion shows the ignorance of our leaders. Why would we allow a country that doesn't like is build weapons of mass destruction? What do they expect to have happen? They are made for one purpose and that's to cause destruction, it's setting not only America up for danger but surrounding ones as well. It isn't a smart choice to allow Iran or any country to build nuclear weapons for any reason in my mind.
-Jonathan Terpstra

 
At 6:17 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

"A continuing resolution must past by Sept. 30 to keep the government from shutting down."

With the ever looming government shut-down in our future congress still manages to put political agenda ahead of state stability. The never ending bickering has wasted no time in wasting time and congress isn't even in session all 30 days of September. I often wonder why they choose to cut its so close every time we are about to hit the debt ceiling.
-Samuel Wheeler

 
At 9:26 AM, Blogger sdf said...

"Boehner’s future as speaker in doubt"

It's fantastic that Boehner is on his way out, but the fact that "people that support Trump" is something that would ever be printed in an article is absolutely tragic-- Trump? Really? For President? This is actually happening? I have very little faith in the challenger if he is the supported by the same people that support Trump.

 
At 8:11 AM, Blogger Unknown said...

"Expect intense floor debate on Iran, starting this afternoon in the Senate. Sept. 17 is the deadline for action on an Iran nuclear agreement resolution."

It is without a doubt past September 17, but I don't keep up with politics, so this is irrelevant anyways. However, in my limited understanding, I believe it is with the United State's best interest to accept (as they did a quick google search revealed) the deal with Iran. Some argue that this is equated to giving candy to a child, but i believe that the US will be able to better monitor Iran's advanced in nuclear weapons if they are on friendly terms. Other side benefits include increased trade-so cheap gas is here to stay-hopefully!

Lucy Li

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

php hit counter