Guest Blogger: Josh P.
OK seriously, I'm going to do my best to keep TVTropes out of this post. For your sake and mine too if certain unnamed haters get a hold of me.
Regardless, we're studying novels. Great American Novels, specifically. But what makes them so great? We've talked about point of view, romance vs. verisimilitude, and other fun things like that. But aren't we forgetting something? When you pick up a novel, either fresh off the shelf at your local B&N, or a nice-smelling old book in the JM bookroom, you don't read it for "teh lulz", or for the point of view, or even for the romance vs. verisimilitude debate (unless you're Mr. Decker, of course). No, you read it for the plot.
Yes, I know what you're gonna say. Plot is low on Bloom's Taxonomy! That's only comprehension level! Go beyond the plot!
But plot is perhaps the most important part of any novel ever written. Plot is the glue that binds together the book - quite literally. Without a plot, James couldn't present his verisimilitude to readers without them dozing off in the middle of the lack-of-story. Wharton couldn't make us read Ethan Frome for a million dollars if it had no story, only Ethan's dull narration of daily life. Faulkner would have no reason to tell us about the Bundrens' journey to Jefferson to bury their dead mother. None of it would work!
So it turns out plot is a little more important than you thought. More examples: How does Shelley develop the character of Viktor Frankenstein? Through plot events. Homer and Odysseus? Through Odysseus's actions and his ultimate fate. Hester Prynne? Her wearing the scarlet letter and her introspection into why she does. Jay Gatsby? He certainly wouldn't be the "Great Gatsby" if the plot didn't develop him and his motives for the reader. Dialogue and introspection, as well as actions and events, are all parts of plot that can in turn allow the deeper levels of comprehension and analysis that lead us to things like romance vs. verisimilitude or point of view.
Ok I'll give you this. In these "Great American Novels", plot takes a backseat. So often we focus on the literary elements of the stories while ignoring their plot, and that's a shame. Reading books with a good twisted plot and lots of revelations about the characters we know and trust can be fun - if we don't analyze it to death.
So what I'm trying to say is this - we read a book for the plot specifically the first time through. Then we look at the deeper literary elements and try to tie them to the plot events and dialogue. Once you start to look at the plot of books, they suddenly don't seem as scary. We can look at Turn of the Screw, As I Lay Dying, Homer's Odyssey, and yes, even perhaps The Scarlet Letter, as perhaps more engaging books where we don't focus totally on the "boring" elements of literature, and maybe even make reading these books for plot enjoyable.
5 Comments:
Great post Josh I completely agree. We must all be careful not to overanalyze novels, and thus suck most of the fun out of them. And I'm proud of you for not including a tvtropes link.
Yes i agree with everything that Jake said... specially the Tv tropes..
However even though I do agree, I find it impractical to fulfill your requests. If we focus on the plot of every book in more detail then what we really do as a class is run out of time to focus on the "Important" parts of the novels such as verisimilitude and so forth. Like i said it would be nice to make these books more enjoyable by making them more plot focused but there is only so much time to work with... Unless you want do use your Non-school time?
Just food for thought, Good post Josh
I disagree because in my experience if I read these novels with the purpose of enjoying the plot then there's no way I would be interested in reading them at all. Many of the novels we read this year I viewed as having boring plots. I am not an avid reader but what AP Lit and AP Language has taught me this year was we can enjoy a novel with a boring plot by analyzing the author's purpose and the different literary elements the author uses to establish the novel's purpose. I have learned that by reaching the higher levels of Bloom's taxonomy we can further analyze and appreciate the purpose of a literary work and engage our minds to a higher level of learning at the same time. However, we all have different opinions but all I can say is AP Lit and AP Lang has given me the tools to appreciate novels, books, poems, and etc more than what I have before.
Ramon F Banzon
Erm... didn't mean to leave 5 of the same comment.
The bad news about plot is that when you write a very compelling plot, full of twists and turns, red herrings, and plenty of your favorite tropes, you end up with about a page or two of technical documentation.
As Abir said, some authors excel on plot, others concentrate on the other "fluff". I would argue (as he probably would) that even the simplest plot could be made compelling - look at Avatar, for instance. The plot was ridiculously straightforward and had a ridiculous happy ending, yet millions of people flocked to it and watched it over and over again. Now, box office success might not be the best way to evaluate a movie (after all, Marmaduke grossed more than $0), but I think the general public is the target audience for most works and what is "best" is what is liked by them... and if that means less plot and more brilliant metaphors and immersive imagery, so be it.
- Thomas
Post a Comment
<< Home