Friday, December 18, 2009

Faith, folly and Uganda's anti-homosexuality bill

This is a must read! As we have spent time discussing Civil Rights and Civil Liberties, the federal court and the law-making process, here is an article that brings it full circle. Don't confuse the issue of homosexuality with the reason I am posting this. Don't let your feelings on this issue color your purpose for reading this. Look at this as a student of political science without the emotion of your experiences that have shaped you. (Good luck with that request...it is tough to do)

Mr. Thompson

Number of Death Sentences Falls

Thought you might enjoy this article since it is so relevant to our recent study of the Supreme Court, Civil Liberties and the Landmark Cases. Interesting to note the reasons the article provides for the decrease in the number of executions in the US in 2009....not the reasons that came to my mind immediately.

Mr. Thompson

Tuesday, December 15, 2009

Guest Blogger: Jordan J.

I’d like to wrap up our unit of inaugural addresses. The President’s inaugural address is a way to restate their goals that they have been campaigning and state to America what exactly they are trying to accomplish in their term. After listing to everyone’s presentation of the different president’s inaugural addresses I wanted to look into how much the presidents actually stick to what they say in their address once they start their term. One example is how President Obama talks about the removal of troops in his inaugural address. “We will begin to responsibly leave Iraq to its people and forge a hard-earned peace in Afghanistan” (President Obama). Although he says that he wants to remove the troops, he has found that that is easier said then done, and he is sending more troops to Afghanistan. This is nothing against President Obama it is merely an example of something that many presidents have done. This makes me wonder if what inaugural addresses actually stand for. Has the new technology of televisions and internet turned a once historical event into just another way for the president to gain popularity with Americans? Or is what the President says in their inaugural address what they really believe they will try to accomplish for the country? One side of me believes that over the years inaugural addresses have just turned into another way to gain popularity, because now with the internet and televisions Presidents have more viewers watching their addresses which give a prime opportunity to gain popularity. On the other side I feel that Presidents are speaking on what they honestly feel they are going to do for our country, but when in comes down to it they have to change what they originally said for the sake of America. Please comment I want to see how everyone else feels about this.

Guest Blogger: Aaron B.

What is the true meaning of education? The dictionary definition is “The act or process of imparting or acquiring general knowledge, developing the powers of reasoning and judgment, and generally of preparing oneself or others intellectually for mature life.” This is exactly what education should be, and is what every school strives for. However, is that what is best for the people in our country? How much education should one person have? Bill Gates, the richest person in the world did not even go to college, while people who have a Ph. D and went to at least 12 years of college earn less than he does. That decision is in the eyes of the beholder and those eyes must choose the key that fits them the best.
Since this unit has just begun there is limited text support I can provide, but Prose and Emmerson offer a beginning. Prose gives insight into the decline of reading, she believes it is because of books that the schools are providing for education. Therefore, she is suggesting that freshmen and sophomores read James Joyce and other higher-level novels. If I were those students, I would read less than I do now (no offense). Emmerson’s view on education is different and I agree with it, I believe he wants the students to succeed in their own way. “It is not for you to choose what he shall know, what he shall do. It is chosen and foreordained, and he only holds the key to his own secret.” Education is not measured by the amount you attend school, but how the students uses what they have learned to succeed in life and as Emmerson says, “It is better to teach the child arithmetic and Latin grammar than rhetoric or moral philosophy.”
Give the student the basics and let them determine what they will do from then on, whether it will be more education or become billionaire like Bill Gates. Let us unlock our own doors!

Monday, December 14, 2009

Obama Doctrine

More and more I am seeing references to the "Obama Doctrine". Probably be a good idea to be able to define the doctrine in your own words. The title of this entry is linked to an article about Obama's Doctrine.

Mr. Thompson

Saturday, December 12, 2009

President Obama's Speech in Oslo

If you haven't read or listened to this, it is a must. Look at the language and think of his purpose. Remember the audience, occasion and context! Each of you should provide a brief response on the language used. There are 4000 words approx. so pick a line or 2 and be brilliant. Don't duplicate though! Post by the Xmas Anon finale.

Mr. Thompson

Response to President Obama's Speech

A critique of President Obama's speech while accepting the Nobel Peace prize. Notice how the author uses Pres. Obama's text to make her point. I wonder how she scored on her AP Language test?

Who is Kathleen Parker and is she credible? Or is she just another liberal supporting her president?

Friday, December 11, 2009

APLG FInal Titles

APLG titles. All blurbs are New York Times Book Review, except as noted. Suggestions welcome.

Stones Into Schools: Promoting Peace With Books, Not Bombs, in Afghanistan and Pakistan
(Dec 2009) by Greg Mortenson , 420pp.
As “Stones Into Schools” explains, the institute has accomplished its innovative educational work without any government money. That point is crucial, since it has allowed the Montana-based institute to reach across borders with remarkable impunity. While “Three Cups of Tea” describes how Mr. Mortenson stumbled into his life’s work, which began as the building of schools for girls in remote parts of Pakistan, “Stones Into Schools” takes him into hazier geographical realms. The new book is about his organization’s expansion into Afghanistan — and into one region so inaccessible that one Afghan official isn’t sure that it doesn’t belong to neighboring Tajikistan or China instead.

Fast Food Nation (2001) by Eric Schlosser, 356 pp.
In the opening pages of ''Fast Food Nation,'' Eric Schlosser makes a series of observations about McDonald's. The company operates about 28,000 restaurants around the world. It's the nation's biggest buyer of beef, pork and potatoes, and the world's biggest owner of retail property. The company is one of the country's top toy distributors and its largest private operator of playgrounds. Ninety-six percent of American schoolchildren can identify Ronald McDonald. Roughly one of every eight workers in the United States has done time at the chain. The McDonald's brand is the most famous, and the most heavily promoted, on the planet. ''The Golden Arches,'' Schlosser says, ''are now more widely recognized than the Christian cross.'' Of course, McDonald's isn't alone. ''The whole experience of buying fast food,'' he writes, ''has become so routine, so thoroughly unexceptional and mundane, that it is now taken for granted, like brushing your teeth or stopping for a red light.''

WHAT THE DOG SAW And Other Adventures (Nov 2009) by Malcolm Gladwell, 410 pp.
Have you ever wondered why there are so many kinds of mustard but only one kind of ketchup? Or what Cézanne did before painting his first significant works in his 50s? Have you hungered for the story behind the Veg-O-Matic, star of the frenetic late-night TV ads? Or wanted to know where Led Zeppelin got the riff in “Whole Lotta Love”? Neither had I, until I began this collection by the indefatigably curious journalist Malcolm Gladwell.

An Omnivore’s Dilemma (2006) by Michael Pollan, 450 pp.
Life is confusing atop the food chain. For most animals, eating is a simple matter of biological imperative: if you're a koala, you seek out eucalyptus leaves; if you're a prairie vole, you munch on bluegrass and clover. But Homo sapiens, encumbered by a big brain and such inventions as agriculture and industry, faces a bewildering array of choices, from scrambled eggs to Chicken McNuggets, from a bowl of fresh strawberries to the petrochemically complex yellow log of sweet, spongy food product known as the Twinkie. "When you can eat just about anything nature has to offer," Michael Pollan writes in his thoughtful, engrossing new book, "The Omnivore's Dilemma," "deciding what you should eat will inevitably stir anxiety."

The Last True Story I’ll Ever Tell: An Accidental Soldier's Account of the War in Iraq (2005) by John Crawford, 219pp.
As a deluge of memoirs begin to address the war in Iraq, certain constants emerge. First of all, these could wind up being the most readily chronicled military experiences in history: no other war has made blogging or photography so accessible. Never before has it been so feasible for soldiers to phone home after a tough day in-country. It's also new for them to get stuck leaving voice-mail messages for loved ones who aren't around to take their calls.

The Tipping Point (2000) by Malcolm Gladwell, 279pp.
''The Tipping Point,'' by Malcolm Gladwell, is a lively, timely and engaging study of fads. Some of those he writes about fit snugly into the long tradition of crowd behavior: out-of-fashion Hush Puppies resurged into popularity in 1994 and '95; teenagers, despite repeated health warnings, continue to smoke and in the past few years have been doing so in increasing numbers; and in 1998 a book called ''Divine Secrets of the Ya-Ya Sisterhood'' reached a sales mark of two and a half million copies. Some of the other phenomena analyzed by Gladwell are a bit more unusual, including the decline in crime in New York City that began under Mayor Rudolph W. Giuliani. But all of them can be taken as examples of how unpredictable people can be when they find themselves in the throes of doing what everyone else is doing at the same time.

Outliers (2008) by Malcolm Gladwell, 309pp.
Gladwell’s latest book, “Outliers,” is a passionate argument for taking the second version of the story more seriously than we now do. “It is not the brightest who succeed,” Gladwell writes. “Nor is success simply the sum of the decisions and efforts we make on our own behalf. It is, rather, a gift. Outliers are those who have been given opportunities — and who have had the strength and presence of mind to seize them.”
He doesn’t actually tell his own life story in the book. (But he lurks offstage, since he does describe the arc of his mother’s Jamaican family.) Instead, he tells other success stories, often using the device of back-to-back narratives. He starts with a tale of individual greatness, about the Beatles or the titans of Silicon Valley or the enormously successful generation of New York Jews born in the early 20th century. Then he adds details that undercut that tale.

Superfreakonomics by (Oct 2009) by Levitt and Stephen Dubner, 288 pp.
“A book with mind-blowing ideas, innovative research and quality investigative journalism, it’s also a story about creativity and what it takes to get the mindset to turn conventional concepts upside down. The authors have found their stride with “SuperFreakonomics.” As good as the first “Freakonomics” was, I found this read much more enjoyable and interesting” (Wall Street Journal), and “A reasonably quick reader could finish it on a coast-to-coast flight, with time left to watch a movie. But the feeling at the end is about the same as the one after reading a Dan Brown novel or eating a bag of Cheetos. You finished the whole thing but didn't walk away feeling particularly proud of yourself. Levitt and Dubner take Gladwellism to its logical extreme: "Superfreakonomics" doesn't really have a broader argument. The authors acknowledge in the opening pages that their book has no unifying theme, beyond the banality that "people respond to incentives." So instead of offering up a bunch of quirky stories of questionable reliability to make an argument that feels coherent, they offer up contrarianism for its own sake. (Washington Post).

The Spirit Catches You and You Fall Down (1997) by Melvin Konner, 339pp.
If tragedy is a conflict of two goods, if it entails the unfolding of deep human tendencies in a cultural context that makes the outcome seem inevitable, if it moves us more than melodrama, then this fine book recounts a poignant tragedy. It is the tale of an immigrant child whose family went in one generation from traditional tribal life in the war-torn mountains of Laos to a bustling existence in the town of Merced in the fertile San Joaquin Valley of California. This was a historic transition, and this child's story is in many ways her people's tale in microcosm -- and taken to an extreme. It is a tale of culture clashes, fear and grief in the face of change, parental love, her doctors' sense of duty, and misperceptions compounded daily until they became colossal misunderstandings. It has no heroes or villains, but it has an abundance of innocent suffering, and it most certainly does have a moral.

Into Thin Air (1997) by Jon Krakauer, 207 pps.
With enough determination, any bloody idiot can get up this hill,'' observed Rob Hall, the leader of a commercial expedition, on his eighth tour of Mount Everest. ''The trick is to get back down alive.''
The particular descent ahead of those on the ''hill'' on May 10, 1996, resulted in the greatest loss of life in the history of mountaineering on Everest. As news spread of the nine deaths (including that of Hall, who spoke to his wife in New Zealand by radiophone as he lay stranded in a snowstorm on the summit ridge), a barrage of questions resounded: What went wrong? Why was the approaching storm ignored? And, most emphatically, why are ''tourists'' with more money than expertise being taken up Everest in the first place? Jon Krakauer was one of the survivors, and in ''Into Thin Air'' he relives the storm and its aftermath, trying to answer those questions.

In the Heart of the Sea (2001) by Nathaniel Philbrick, 320pp.
The ordeal of the whaleship Essex was an event as mythic in the nineteenth century as the sinking of the Titanic was in the twentieth. In 1819, the Essex left Nantucket for the South Pacific with twenty crew members aboard. In the middle of the South Pacific the ship was rammed and sunk by an angry sperm whale. The crew drifted for more than ninety days in three tiny whaleboats, succumbing to weather, hunger, disease, and ultimately turning to drastic measures in the fight for survival. Nathaniel Philbrick uses little-known documents-including a long-lost account written by the ship's cabin boy-and penetrating details about whaling and the Nantucket community to reveal the chilling events surrounding this epic maritime disaster. An intense and mesmerizing read, In the Heart of the Sea is a monumental work of history forever placing the Essex tragedy in the American historical canon.

The Glass Castle (2005) by Francine Prose 288pp.
How fitting, then, that the title of Jeannette Walls's chilling memoir, ''The Glass Castle,'' should evoke the architecture of fantasy and magic. The transparent palace that Walls's father often promised to build for his children functions as a metaphor for another fanciful construct, the carefree facade with which two people who were (to say the least) unsuited to raise children camouflaged their struggle to survive in a world for which they were likewise ill equipped.

Churchill (Nov 2009) by Paul Johnson, 192 pp.
In this enthusiastic yet first-rate biography, veteran British historian Johnson (Modern Times) asserts that Winston Churchill (1874–1965) was the 20th century's most valuable figure: No man did more to preserve freedom and democracy.... An ambitious, world-traveling soldier and bestselling author, Churchill was already famous on entering Parliament in 1899 and within a decade was working with Lloyd George to pass the great reforms of 1908–1911. As First Lord of the Admiralty, he performed brilliantly in preparing the navy for WWI, but blame—undeserved according to Johnson—for the catastrophic 1915 Dardanelles invasion drove him from office. Within two years, he was back at the top, where he remained until the Depression. Johnson delivers an adulatory account of Churchill's prescient denunciations of Hitler and heroics during the early days of WWII, and views later missteps less critically than other historians. He concludes that Churchill was a thoroughly likable great man with many irritating flaws but no nasty ones: he lacked malice, avoided grudges, vendettas and blame shifting, and quickly replaced enmity with friendship. Biographers in love with their subjects usually produce mediocre history, but Johnson, always self-assured as well as scholarly, has written another highly opinionated, entertaining work. B&w photos. (Nov.)

John Adams (2001) by David McCullough, 751 pp.
In fact, Mr. McCullough, the Pulitzer Prize-winning author, is campaigning for a memorial to Adams. Until one is built, he has contributed a monument of his own, a biography, ''John Adams'' (Simon & Schuster), which has been No. 1 on the New York Times best-seller list for three weeks.

Imperial Life in the Emerald City: Inside Iraq's Green Zone (2006) by Rajiv Chandrasekaran, 300pp.
Regardless of how the war ends, Iraq is not Vietnam. This is true not just militarily and politically but also in the reporting about the two conflicts. For many journalists who covered Vietnam and subsequently wrote books about the war, the experience could be understood only as a hallucinogenic nightmare, and they described it in gonzo prose to match. The reality of Iraq is much more frightening than a bad acid trip, but the writing about this continuing fiasco has been cleareyed and sober, and all the more powerful for it. Rajiv Chandrasekaran's ''Imperial Life in the Emerald City: Inside Iraq's Green Zone'' is a fine example.

Apl/G Shirts

Below are the links to view the samples for the various styles and designs.

http://www.customink.com/designs/2928-8542-5022/15377443-1/print
-Mark … not serious

http://www.customink.com/designs/tempest/15375137-3320242/hotlink?cm_ven=hotlink&cm_cat=1&cm_pla=Body_img&cm_ite=designfront
-Abir

http://www.customink.com/designs/aplg/15374297-1899235/hotlink?cm_ven=hotlink&cm_cat=2&cm_pla=Body_img&cm_ite=designfront
-Keenan

http://www.customink.com/designs/aplg2010/15374713-3320127/hotlink?cm_ven=hotlink&cm_cat=1&cm_pla=Body_txt&cm_ite=button
-josh

http://www.customink.com/designs/aplg2/15377628-1899235/hotlink?cm_ven=hotlink&cm_cat=2&cm_pla=Body_txt&cm_ite=link2
-Keenan /josh

http://www.customink.com/designs/aplg4/15372997-3319500/hotlink?cm_ven=hotlink&cm_cat=2&cm_pla=Body_txt&cm_ite=link2
-Steph

http://www.customink.com/designs/aplg3/15372841-3319500/hotlink?cm_ven=hotlink&cm_cat=2&cm_pla=Body_txt&cm_ite=link2
-Josh / Steph

http://www.customink.com/designs/aplg2/15372541-3319500/hotlink?cm_ven=hotlink&cm_cat=2&cm_pla=Body_txt&cm_ite=link2
-Steph

http://www.customink.com/designs/aplg1/15372302-3319500/hotlink?cm_ven=hotlink&cm_cat=1&cm_pla=Body_txt&cm_ite=link2
-Steph

Guest Blogger: Braedon W.

This week we have been exploring the workings of the United States Judicial System. We have seen how cases of varying importance make their way through both the State and Federal level courts, by walking through a small crime that can be handled with a quick trial to a larger one that may have to go through several courts to reach a decision. I found it interesting how the Supreme Court was able to do its job properly when they have over 10,000 petitions that are on the docket per term. This made me wonder how cases are chosen to be given the attention of the most prestigious court in our nation, as well as what happens to the cases that are denied.
After doing a little research I found that all of the eligible cases are presented in the form of a petition for writs of certiorari. Once the petition has been submitted it is voted on by the Justices in a conference session. The Justices will decide on hearing a case if it has compelling reasons such as the interpretation of a federal law or the Constitution as well as other reasons. The Justices will usually grant plenary review and oral arguments by an attorney to around 100 cases per term. In addition to hearing these cases the Justices will give formal written opinions to 80-90 cases per term.
This means that several thousand cases are denied by the Supreme Court each year. So what ends up happening to them? When the Supreme Court denies a case, which happens in most circumstances, the ruling in the lower court is upheld as the final ruling.
I know when I hear about a court case today the first thing that I think of is how much time it will take for a decision to be made. It could be argued that our judicial system isn’t efficient, but I for one would rather have a fair and just trail instead of a controversial trial such as the Amanda Knox trial in Italy.

Friday, December 04, 2009

Guest Blogger: Ramon B

Recently we have been discussing the issue of the separation of state and religion and using it as an example for our Argumentation unit. We have written essays, outlines, and had discussions about the issue. My personal belief is it is impossible to completely divide and separate religion and government. The articles that Mr. Edmonds provided us that talked about the issue of the separation of church and states provided different views and beliefs on the issue. The side that I stand for is the right and acceptance to combine religion and government together. Religion and government are things that cannot be separated. Whenever a law is created, society adopts and honors a belief that is rooted to religion. The law such as murder is wrong and an act not tolerated in society is a law that is based on the beliefs of almost all religions around the world. When we celebrate the activities of Christmas Anonymous at our public school we are celebrating the holiday of Christmas which is celebrated by Christians around the world. As a nation the celebration of Christmas is widely celebrated by the majority of Americans around the world by Christians and non Christians. If we celebrate Christmas which is a Christian holiday that celebrates our savior’s birth, then how come many people in America argue that the Pledge of Allegiance should not be said in schools because of the phrase “one nation under God.” We live in a society where people choose to include religious ideas and beliefs but deny the fact that it is rooted to a religion. I think that we live in a society where most people do not fully understand the fact that most of our government leaders that sets our society’s laws and standards belong to a religion which serves as their guide when they perform their job. The First Amendment to the Constitution states that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof” I interpret this statement as the government cannot make a national religion that everyone is forced to follow and worship, however they have the right to incorporate different religious beliefs in their government and at the same time give their citizens the freedom to practice any religion. Religion is something that will always be the guide to how a government is run and the laws and standards that it sets. Religion will always have an influence on how a government is run even if the government bans religious phrases and statues in public buildings the ideas and beliefs of religion will always be incorporated in government laws and standards. It would just be the people’s choice if they want to admit it or not that it is based on one or more religious belief.

Ramon F Banzon

Tuesday, December 01, 2009

Role of Religion in U.S. Government


Add your examples below; the more controversial they are, the higher their credibility needs to be.

The example to the left is Andy G's, with this text:







Its interesting that the people we are voting for use religion to pull in those extra votes and once elected use a biblical quote in their inaugural speech. Figures that our heads of state wouldnt remain separate from religion at least during their campaign. Mr. Mike Huckabee feels he was scrutinized to much on his theological beliefs even though he brought them into his campaign

Reporter: Generally speaking, do you think it’s fair for people to take a candidate’s theological convictions into consideration at the polling place?

Huckabee: As long as everyone gets the same scrutiny. That’s what I don’t think is fair: I’ve been given an unusual level of scrutiny. No candidate gets quizzed to the depth that I do about faith.

May sound fair but not everyone gives their input on religion during their campaign why be scrutinize for something you didn’t give in put on

http://www.gq.com/news-politics/newsmakers/200712/mike-huckabee-gop-republican-presidency

php hit counter